NET Research

The ONE Research Foundation (ONE) is comprised of individuals who are committed to the natural non-invasive healing of the mind and body. ONE is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) dedicated to making these natural methods available to all as the standard of care. Visit

Watch the trailer for The ONE Research Foundation’s new documentary film: STRESSED

From a recently published study:

Figure 1: Before NET treatment — with these fMRI images we can actually see what the brain looks like during the re-experiencing of a past traumatic event (before a patient is treated with NET).

Figure 2: After NET treatment — these post-treatment fMRI images demonstrate how the brain has returned to normal healthy functioning as a result of the NET intervention — even when the patient is again exposed to the same information that was traumatic before treatment. READ MORE about this study

J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0601-8.

Neuro emotional technique effects on brain physiology in cancer patients with traumatic stress symptoms: preliminary findings.

Monti DA1, Tobia A1, Stoner M1, Wintering N1, Matthews M1, He XS2, Doucet G2, Chervoneva I3, Tracy JI2, Newberg AB4,5


PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the neurophysiological and clinical effects that may result from the neuro emotional technique (NET) in patients with traumatic stress symptoms associated with a cancer-related event. We hypothesized that self-regulatory processing of traumatic memories would be observable as physiological changes in key brain areas after undergoing the NET intervention and that these changes would be associated with improvement of traumatic stress symptoms.

METHODS: We enrolled 23 participants with a prior cancer diagnosis who expressed a distressing cancer-related memory that was associated with traumatic stress symptoms of at least 6 months in duration. Participants were randomized to either the NET intervention or a waitlist control condition. To evaluate the primary outcome of neurophysiological effects, all participants received functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the auditory presentation of both a neutral stimulus and a description of the specific traumatic event. Pre/post-comparisons were performed between the traumatic and neutral condition, within and between groups. Psychological measures included the Impact of Event Scale (IES), State Trait Anxiety Index (STAI), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18, and Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI).

RESULTS: The initial fMRI scans in both groups showed significant increases in the bilateral parahippocampus and brainstem. After NET, reactivity in the parahippocampus, brainstem, anterior cingulate, and insula was significantly decreased during the traumatic stimulus. Likewise, participants receiving the NET intervention had significant reductions (p < 0.05) compared to the control group in distress as measured by the BSI-18 global severity index, anxiety as measured by the STAI, and traumatic stress as measured by the IES and PTCI.

CONCLUSIONS: This study is an initial step towards understanding mechanistic features of the NET intervention. Specifically, brain regions involved with traumatic memories and distress such as the brainstem, insula, anterior cingulate gyrus, and parahippocampus had significantly reduced activity after the NET intervention and were associated with clinical improvement of symptoms associated with distressing recollections.